<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: New Development Build</title>
	<atom:link href="http://untidy.net/blog/2009/11/19/new-development-build/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://untidy.net/blog/2009/11/19/new-development-build/</link>
	<description>simon steele writes about stuff...</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 22 Feb 2010 16:52:25 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: anonymous</title>
		<link>http://untidy.net/blog/2009/11/19/new-development-build/comment-page-1/#comment-42834</link>
		<dc:creator>anonymous</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 12 Dec 2009 05:45:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://untidy.net/blog/?p=377#comment-42834</guid>
		<description>@johnwait: Ah, thanks for the explanation and the solution. That definitely worked out :)

Having to do this for each and every occurrence in the Registry is extremely painful, though. I agree that any arguments passed after -z (excluding the executable path) should probably be assumed to be part of the single file argument.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@johnwait: Ah, thanks for the explanation and the solution. That definitely worked out <img src='http://untidy.net/blog/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
<p>Having to do this for each and every occurrence in the Registry is extremely painful, though. I agree that any arguments passed after -z (excluding the executable path) should probably be assumed to be part of the single file argument.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: johnwait</title>
		<link>http://untidy.net/blog/2009/11/19/new-development-build/comment-page-1/#comment-42833</link>
		<dc:creator>johnwait</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 12 Dec 2009 02:51:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://untidy.net/blog/?p=377#comment-42833</guid>
		<description>&lt;a href=&quot;#comment-42832&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;@anonymous&lt;/a&gt;: This happens when there are one or more space characters in the filename. Windows wraps in double quotes the path of the image to be debugged (i.e. &quot;%SYSTEMROOT%\System32\notepad.exe&quot;), but not the arguments (i.e. the text file).

But this is not an issue with PN, or even a problem with IFEO. Actually, this is because of the way the default file associations are set in Windows. Notepad doesn&#039;t require quotes around filenames; i.e. it will consider it&#039;s whole command line as one, single filename to open, quotes present or not. So Windows doesn&#039;t use any for notepad, by default. Whenever you shell-run a *.txt file with the IFEO&#039;s Debugger option set, Windows just launches the debugger and passes whatever HKCR\txtfile\shell\open\command specifies (if it&#039;s still &quot;txtfile&quot; for *.txt files), and by default it is: %SystemRoot%\system32\NOTEPAD.EXE %1 (see, no quotes). Hell, long ago I made myself a context-menu shell add-in so I can open any file with notepad, and copied over the same command line.

To fix this, you (the user) would have to add quotes around notepad&#039;s argument wherever it is used, starting with HKCR\txtfile\shell\open\command (or whatever your handler is for *.txt files). Or, the dev could implement, through a new switch, a notepad-compatible mode, where PN (after the ignored &quot;notepad.exe&quot;, using -z) would assume the remaining arguments of the command line is just a single file, quote or not, just like notepad.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="#comment-42832" rel="nofollow nofollow">@anonymous</a>: This happens when there are one or more space characters in the filename. Windows wraps in double quotes the path of the image to be debugged (i.e. &#8220;%SYSTEMROOT%\System32\notepad.exe&#8221;), but not the arguments (i.e. the text file).</p>
<p>But this is not an issue with PN, or even a problem with IFEO. Actually, this is because of the way the default file associations are set in Windows. Notepad doesn&#8217;t require quotes around filenames; i.e. it will consider it&#8217;s whole command line as one, single filename to open, quotes present or not. So Windows doesn&#8217;t use any for notepad, by default. Whenever you shell-run a *.txt file with the IFEO&#8217;s Debugger option set, Windows just launches the debugger and passes whatever HKCR\txtfile\shell\open\command specifies (if it&#8217;s still &#8220;txtfile&#8221; for *.txt files), and by default it is: %SystemRoot%\system32\NOTEPAD.EXE %1 (see, no quotes). Hell, long ago I made myself a context-menu shell add-in so I can open any file with notepad, and copied over the same command line.</p>
<p>To fix this, you (the user) would have to add quotes around notepad&#8217;s argument wherever it is used, starting with HKCR\txtfile\shell\open\command (or whatever your handler is for *.txt files). Or, the dev could implement, through a new switch, a notepad-compatible mode, where PN (after the ignored &#8220;notepad.exe&#8221;, using -z) would assume the remaining arguments of the command line is just a single file, quote or not, just like notepad.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: anonymous</title>
		<link>http://untidy.net/blog/2009/11/19/new-development-build/comment-page-1/#comment-42832</link>
		<dc:creator>anonymous</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 11 Dec 2009 14:18:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://untidy.net/blog/?p=377#comment-42832</guid>
		<description>Is this version supposed to support the Image File Execution Options notepad.exe replacement? It doesn&#039;t appear to be the case (PN is complaining the disk and/or file being missing).</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Is this version supposed to support the Image File Execution Options notepad.exe replacement? It doesn&#8217;t appear to be the case (PN is complaining the disk and/or file being missing).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Simon</title>
		<link>http://untidy.net/blog/2009/11/19/new-development-build/comment-page-1/#comment-42818</link>
		<dc:creator>Simon</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 26 Nov 2009 14:58:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://untidy.net/blog/?p=377#comment-42818</guid>
		<description>Glad you like it, knew I&#039;d forgotten one!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Glad you like it, knew I&#8217;d forgotten one!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: tom</title>
		<link>http://untidy.net/blog/2009/11/19/new-development-build/comment-page-1/#comment-42815</link>
		<dc:creator>tom</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 25 Nov 2009 06:13:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://untidy.net/blog/?p=377#comment-42815</guid>
		<description>one update you did not mention but I found useful is the &quot;split view&quot; feature. Thanks.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>one update you did not mention but I found useful is the &#8220;split view&#8221; feature. Thanks.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: johnbillion</title>
		<link>http://untidy.net/blog/2009/11/19/new-development-build/comment-page-1/#comment-42813</link>
		<dc:creator>johnbillion</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 24 Nov 2009 19:07:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://untidy.net/blog/?p=377#comment-42813</guid>
		<description>Any pointers on what Virtual Space is and its usage?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Any pointers on what Virtual Space is and its usage?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Simon</title>
		<link>http://untidy.net/blog/2009/11/19/new-development-build/comment-page-1/#comment-42812</link>
		<dc:creator>Simon</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 23 Nov 2009 13:53:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://untidy.net/blog/?p=377#comment-42812</guid>
		<description>Yup, definitely time to switch. All new work is going into the Hg repository.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yup, definitely time to switch. All new work is going into the Hg repository.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Matt</title>
		<link>http://untidy.net/blog/2009/11/19/new-development-build/comment-page-1/#comment-42807</link>
		<dc:creator>Matt</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 20 Nov 2009 03:26:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://untidy.net/blog/?p=377#comment-42807</guid>
		<description>Is it time for those building from source to switch over to Hg?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Is it time for those building from source to switch over to Hg?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
